• Profile
Close

Thin composite wire strut, durable polymer-coated (Resolute Onyx) vs ultrathin cobalt–chromium strut, bioresorbable polymer-coated (Orsiro) drug-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIONYX): An international, single-blind, randomised non-inferiority trial

The Lancet Sep 30, 2018

von Birgelen C, et al. - Researchers conducted the first randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness and safety of the Resolute Onyx stent vs the Orsiro stent, which has ultrathin cobalt–chromium struts. At 1-year follow-up in allcomers, the Resolute Onyx stent was non-inferior to Orsiro for a combined safety and efficacy endpoint. The low event rate in the Resolute Onyx group and the Orsiro group indicates the safety of both stents.

Methods

  • For this investigation, researchers conducted an investigator-initiated, assessor-blinded and patient-blinded, randomized non-inferiority trial in an allcomers population at seven independently monitored centers in Belgium, Israel, and the Netherlands.
  • Eligibility criteria included participants who were 18 years or older and required percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.
  • Members of the catheterization laboratory team used web-based computer-generated allocation sequences to randomly assign patients (1:1) to either the Resolute Onyx or the Orsiro stent after guide wire passage, with or without predilation.
  • By sex and diabetes status, randomization was stratified.
  • After that, patients and assessors were masked to allocated stents, but treating clinicians were not.
  • Target vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) at 1 year was the primary endpoint, and was assessed by intention to treat (non-inferiority margin 2.5%) on the basis of outcomes adjudicated by an independent event committee.

Results

  • Two thousand, five hundred sixteen subjects were selected, 2,488 of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (28 withdrawals or screening failures) between October 7, 2015 and December 23, 2016.
  • One thousand, two hundred forty-three study participants were assigned to the Resolute Onyx group, and 1,245 study participants were assigned to the Orsiro group.
  • It was observed that 1,765 (70.9%) participants presented with acute coronary syndromes and 1,275 (51.2%) had myocardial infarctions.
  • For 2,478 (99.6%) patients, 1-year follow-up was available.
  • It was noted that the primary endpoint was met by 55 (4.5%) patients in the Resolute Onyx group and 58 (4.7%) in the Orsiro group.
  • Thus, non-inferiority of Resolute Onyx to Orsiro was established (absolute risk difference -0.2% [95% CI -1.9 to 1.4]; upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI 1.1%; p non-inferiority=0.0005).
  • Findings revealed that definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in one (0.1%) participant in the Resolute Onyx group and 9 (0.7%) in the Orsiro group (hazard ratio 0.11 [95% CI 0.01–0.87]; p=0.0112).
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay