The PanOptix trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 active focus and ReSTOR 3.0-add multifocal lenses: A study of patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and uncorrected visual performance
Clinical Ophthalmology Mar 10, 2021
Hovanesian JA, et al. - In this prospective, open-label, multicenter analysis, researchers sought to compare spectacle independence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dysphotopsia after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the AcrySof PanOptix trifocal or the ReSTOR +2.5/3.0 D or ReSTOR +2.5 D mini-monovision multifocal IOL. Participants in the study were 59 patients, mean age 69 ± 9.6 years. Findings revealed that there was a higher percentage of patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in the PanOptix cohort (n = 52, 88%) than in the 2.5 mini-monovision cohort (n = 57, 56%) or the 2.5/3.0 cohort (n = 18, 22%). The AcrySof PanOptix trifocal offers significantly higher spectacle independence across all measured activities than the AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal IOLs.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries