• Profile
Close

Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter vs a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: A retrospective analysis of multihospital US database

BMJ Open Aug 11, 2020

Costea A, Goldstein L, Maccioni S, et al. - This retrospective, observational cohort analysis was undertaken to compare real-world clinical as well as financial results in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients receiving cardiac ablation with the contact force-sensing porous tip THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF (STSF) catheter vs the Arctic Front Advance Cryoballoon (AFA-CB) catheter. For this purpose, Premier Healthcare Database was used. Matched cohorts of STSF and AFA-CB patients were compared in terms of cost, length of stay, readmissions, direct current cardioversion and reablation outcomes. Findings revealed that patients with AF receiving cardiac catheter ablation using the STSF catheter vs the AFA-CB catheter had lower index ablation total and supply costs. In relation to the STSF catheter vs the AFA-CB catheter, a significantly lower probability of 4-month to 6-month cardiovascular-associated readmission was noted.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay