• Profile
Close

Noninvasive long-term ECG monitoring vs loop recorder implantation for the atrial fibrillation management

Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology Jul 29, 2019

Mamchur SE, et al. - In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the efficacy of a noninvasive ambulatory ECG monitoring (NIAM) vs implantable loop recorder (ILR) was assessed. Randomization of 32 patients (58 [47; 73] years of age) into two groups was done; in group I (n = 15), invasive ECG monitoring was done using the “Reveal XT” ILR up to 3 months, and in group II (n = 17), NIAM up to 14 days was done using the “Spyder” device. Data results revealed the comparable diagnostic ability of NIAM and ILR in patients with paroxysmal AF. No additional diagnostic information is gained with an increase in the duration of ECG monitoring for longer than two weeks.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay