Meta-analysis and systematic review on laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for gastric cancer: Preliminary study for a multicenter prospective KLASS07 trial
European Journal of Surgical Oncology Jun 26, 2019
Jin HE, et al. - Researchers examined surgical outcomes, postoperative recovery, pain, and complications following curative surgical treatment of gastric cancer using laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) vs totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG). Exploring PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases, they included 25 studies (24 non-RCT and 1 RCT) with a total of 4562 gastric cancer patients in the meta-analysis. Outcomes revealed no significant differences between TLDG and LADG regarding surgical outcomes and postoperative complications, including anastomotic-related morbidity. Therefore, extra-surgical values, such as cosmesis, economics, and patient's quality of life, superseded surgical outcomes, in selecting surgical procedures for these patients.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries