Improving public health control of schistosomiasis with a modified WHO strategy: A model-based comparison study
The Lancet Global Health Sep 24, 2019
Li EY, et al. - Via a model-based comparison study, researchers contrasted the current WHO guideline-based approaches from 2012 to an alternative, adaptive decision-making framework for control in heterogeneous environments, to evaluate their predicted relative efficiency and time to attainment of defined public health goals. In high-risk communities, current WHO strategies for MDA were not prognosticated to attain morbidity control in 80% of simulations over a 10-year period, whereas the modified adaptive approach was prognosticated to accomplish this goal in over 50% of simulations within 5 years. In low-risk and moderate-risk communities, current WHO guidelines from 2012 were prognosticated to attain morbidity control in most simulations, however, the suggested adaptive approach attained this goal in a shorter period. The model prognosticated that adding snail control to the proposed adaptive strategy would accomplish morbidity control in all high-risk communities, and 54% of communities could grasp the goal for elimination as a public health problem (< 1% heavy infection) within 7 years. Therefore, the modified adaptive decision-making framework is prognosticated to be more efficient compared with the current WHO guidelines in reaching 2025 public health goals, particularly for high-prevalence regions. Changes in current guidelines could decrease the time and resources required for countries that are currently managing to attain public health goals, against schistosomiasis.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries