• Profile
Close

Impact of physiologic pacing vs right ventricular pacing among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%: A systematic review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Aug 16, 2019

Slotwiner DJ, Raitt MH, Del-Carpio Munoz F, et al. - Among patients without severe left ventricular dysfunction (> 35%) who needed permanent pacing due to heart block, researchers assessed if cardiac biventricular pacing (BiVP) and/or His bundle pacing (HisBP) might avert adverse remodeling and be connected to structural, functional, and clinical benefits vs right ventricular pacing (RVP). Relevant randomized trials and observational studies were identified from MEDLINE and Embase. They included data from eight studies, comprising 679 patients satisfying the prespecified criteria for inclusion. Findings were compared for BiVP vs RVP, HisBP vs RVP, and BiVP+HisBP vs RVP. Compared with RVP, either BiVP or HisBP resulted in the preservation or increase of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) among patients with LVEF > 35%. However, the improvement seen in patient-centered clinical outcome seemed to be restricted mostly to those with chronic atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response rates and had undergone atrioventricular node ablation.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay