• Profile
Close

Development and evaluation of diagnostic criteria for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease

JAMA Ophthalmology Jul 14, 2018

Yang P, et al. - Experts developed and assessed a set of diagnostic criteria for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease using data from Chinese patients. A high sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were demonstrated in comparison with the Revised Diagnostic Criteria for VKH Disease (RDC).

Methods

  • In this case-control study authors reviewed medical records of patients from a tertiary referral center between October 2011 and October 2016.
  • They used the data from 634 patients with VKH disease and 623 patients with non-VKH uveitis from southern China to develop the Diagnostic Criteria for VKH Disease (DCV).
  • In order to evaluate the diagnostic criteria, they used the data from an additional group of 537 patients with a definite VKH disease diagnosis and 525 patients with non-VKH uveitis from northern China.
  • Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver operating characteristic were the main outcomes and measures.

Results

  • As per data, out of the 1257 patients used to construct the DCV, 665 (52.9%) were male, and the mean (SD) age at disease onset was 38.6 (13.6) years.
  • Findings suggested that the latent class analysis selected the 3-class model and 21 clinical findings.
  • Results demonstrated that variables with a high positive rate in the early-phase or late-phase VKH group or high specificity constituted essential parameters.
  • The DCV was constructed by the constellations of these essential parameters.
  • Compared to those of the Revised Diagnostic Criteria for VKH Disease (RDC), the sensitivity and NPV of the DCV were higher (sensitivity: 94.6% vs 71.9%; difference, 22.7%; 95% CI, 18.5-27.0; NPV: 94.3% vs 76.6%; difference, 17.7%; 95% CI, 13.9-21.5).
  • Researchers noted that there was no difference in the specificity and PPV of the DCV from that of the RDC (specificity: 92.2% vs 93.9%; difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, -1.4 to 4.8; PPV: 89.3% vs 92.3%; difference, 3.0%; 95% CI, -1.4 to 4.8).
  • They found the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the DCV and the RDC to be 0.934 (95% CI, 0.917-0.951) and 0.829 (95% CI, 0.803-0.855), respectively.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay