Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter mitral valve repair vs medical therapy in patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation: Results from the COAPT trial
Circulation Oct 06, 2019
Baron SJ, Wang K, Arnold SV, et al. - Researchers compared transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in terms of cost-effectiveness in heart-failure patients with 3-4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), by utilizing data from the COAPT trial, which showed reduced mortality and heart-failure hospitalizations and improved quality of life in relation to edge-to-edge TMVr using the MitraClip vs maximally-tolerated GDMT in heart-failure patients with 3-4+ SMR. For TMVr procedure and index hospitalization, the initial expenses were estimated to be $35,755 and $48,198, respectively. Despite significantly lower follow-up costs reported with TMVr vs GDMT, TMVr was associated with higher cumulative 2-year costs and the reason for this was the up-front cost of the index procedure. At a cost of $45,648, an increase in the life expectancy by 1.13 years and in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) by 0.82 years was estimated to be offered by TMVr in symptomatic heart-failure patients with 3-4+ SMR, on modelling intrial survival, health utilities, and expenses over a lifetime horizon, providing a lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $40,361/life-year gained and $55,600/QALY gained. Based on current US thresholds, this is an acceptable economic value.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries