Comparison of pain after subepithelial vs conventional accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus
International Ophthalmology May 13, 2018
Li S, et al. - Authors sought to compare the postoperative pain and epithelial healing time in conventional and subepithelial accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus. They noted a significant improvement in the postoperative pain as well as reduced epithelial healing time for the treatment of keratoconus with subepithelial accelerated CXL. In the subepithelial group, no complications developed, whereas in 3 eyes in the conventional group peripheral corneal sterile infiltrate was observed, which disappeared after being treated with steroids for a week.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries