• Profile
Close

Comparing the cost effectiveness of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants with well-managed warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of bleeding

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs May 16, 2018

Hospodar AR, et al. - Researchers used a Markov state-transition model to quantify lifetime costs in $US and stroke-preventing effectiveness in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for the six treatments compared in this study viz, edoxaban 60 mg, apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, and well-managed warfarin with a time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 70% among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of bleeding. The analysis was re-run for two other estimates of TTR: 65 and 75%. The comparative cost effectiveness of edoxaban and warfarin was found to be highly sensitive to TTR. At the $US100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, findings showed that warfarin was the most cost-effective treatment for patients who could achieve a TTR of 70%.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay