Comparative evaluation of clinical methods of tear film stability assessment: A randomized crossover study
JAMA Ophthalmology Feb 07, 2018
Wang MTM, et al. - In this trial, the experts compared the tear film stability measurements acquired with an automated noninvasive corneal topographer vs conventional fluorescein methods and assessed their respective discriminative ability in detecting dry eye. Significantly shorter time measurements with narrower distributions were noted in conventional fluorescein tear film breakup, whereas automated noninvasive keratograph readings demonstrated superior discriminative ability in detecting dry eye.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries