Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial
The Lancet Sep 30, 2018
Stone GW, et al. - Experts assessed polymeric everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) with optimized implantation technique vs cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents in terms of target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 30 days in patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes. Non-inferior 30-day and 1-year rates of target lesion failure and angina were the results with polymeric BVS implanted with optimized technique vs metallic DES in an expanded patient population.
Methods
- Experts recruited patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes aged 18 years or older from 147 hospitals in 5 countries (US, Germany, Australia, Singapore, and Canada) in the active-controlled, blinded, multicenter, randomized ABSORB IV trial.
- They randomly assigned (1:1) the enrolled patients to receive polymeric everolimus-eluting BVS (Absorb; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with optimized implantation technique or cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES; Xience; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, US).
- They stratified randomization by diabetic status, whether patients would have been eligible for enrolment in the previous ABSORB III trial, and site.
- Researchers masked the patients and clinical assessors to randomization.
- Target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 30 days, tested for non-inferiority with a 2.9% margin for the risk difference was the primary endpoint.
- Intention to treat analysis was performed.
Results
- As per data, 18,722 patients were screened for eligibility between August 15, 2014 and March 31, 2017, 2,604 of whom were enrolled.
- They assigned 1,296 patients to BVS, and 1,308 patients to EES; at 30 days and 1 year, follow-up data were available for 1,288 and 1,254 patients with BVS and for 1,303 and 1,272 patients with EES, respectively.
- In 622 (24%) of 2,602 patients, biomarker-positive acute coronary syndromes were present, and, by angiographic core laboratory analysis, 78 (3%) of 2,893 of lesions were in very small vessels.
- In 64 (5.0%) patients assigned to BVS, target lesion failure occurred at 30 days and 48 (3.7%) patients assigned to EES (difference 1.3%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 2.89; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0.0244).
- They noted occurrence of target lesion failure at 1 year in 98 (7.8%) patients assigned to BVS and 82 (6.4%) patients assigned to EES (difference 1.4%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 3.4; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0.0006).
- Results demonstrated that in 270 (20.3%) patients assigned to BVS and 274 (20.5%) patients assigned to EES (difference -0.3%, 95% CI -3.4% to 2.9%; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0.0008; two-sided psuperiority=0.8603) angina, adjudicated by a central events committee, occurred at 1 year.
- Findings suggested that device thrombosis within 1 year occurred in nine (0.7%) patients assigned to BVS and four (0.3%) patients assigned to EES (p=0.1586).
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries