• Profile
Close

Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial

The Lancet Sep 30, 2018

Stone GW, et al. - Experts assessed polymeric everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) with optimized implantation technique vs cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents in terms of target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 30 days in patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes. Non-inferior 30-day and 1-year rates of target lesion failure and angina were the results with polymeric BVS implanted with optimized technique vs metallic DES in an expanded patient population.

Methods

  • Experts recruited patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes aged 18 years or older from 147 hospitals in 5 countries (US, Germany, Australia, Singapore, and Canada) in the active-controlled, blinded, multicenter, randomized ABSORB IV trial.
  • They randomly assigned (1:1) the enrolled patients to receive polymeric everolimus-eluting BVS (Absorb; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with optimized implantation technique or cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES; Xience; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, US).
  • They stratified randomization by diabetic status, whether patients would have been eligible for enrolment in the previous ABSORB III trial, and site.
  • Researchers masked the patients and clinical assessors to randomization.
  • Target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 30 days, tested for non-inferiority with a 2.9% margin for the risk difference was the primary endpoint.
  • Intention to treat analysis was performed.

Results

  • As per data, 18,722 patients were screened for eligibility between August 15, 2014 and March 31, 2017, 2,604 of whom were enrolled.
  • They assigned 1,296 patients to BVS, and 1,308 patients to EES; at 30 days and 1 year, follow-up data were available for 1,288 and 1,254 patients with BVS and for 1,303 and 1,272 patients with EES, respectively.
  • In 622 (24%) of 2,602 patients, biomarker-positive acute coronary syndromes were present, and, by angiographic core laboratory analysis, 78 (3%) of 2,893 of lesions were in very small vessels.
  • In 64 (5.0%) patients assigned to BVS, target lesion failure occurred at 30 days and 48 (3.7%) patients assigned to EES (difference 1.3%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 2.89; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0.0244).
  • They noted occurrence of target lesion failure at 1 year in 98 (7.8%) patients assigned to BVS and 82 (6.4%) patients assigned to EES (difference 1.4%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 3.4; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0.0006).
  • Results demonstrated that in 270 (20.3%) patients assigned to BVS and 274 (20.5%) patients assigned to EES (difference -0.3%, 95% CI -3.4% to 2.9%; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0.0008; two-sided psuperiority=0.8603) angina, adjudicated by a central events committee, occurred at 1 year.
  • Findings suggested that device thrombosis within 1 year occurred in nine (0.7%) patients assigned to BVS and four (0.3%) patients assigned to EES (p=0.1586).
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay