Biomechanical comparison of C1 lateral mass—C2 short pedicle screw—C3 lateral mass screw-rod construct vs Goel-Harms fixation for atlantoaxial instability
Spine Mar 23, 2019
Lu Y, et al. - In this study, researchers assessed the atlantoaxial stability and stiffness of a C1 lateral mass – C2 short pedicle – C3 lateral mass screw-rod construct in comparison to C1 lateral mass – C2 pedicle screw-rod construct. They observed significantly lower C1-C2 angular range of motion (ROM) and greater stiffness as compared to the intact state. C1 lateral mass - C2 short pedicle - C3 lateral mass screw fixation (C2SPED-C3LM) demonstrated significantly lower C1-C2 ROM during flexion/extension (FE) and lateral bending (LB), significantly greater C1-C2 stiffness in flexion and right/left LB, comparable C1-C2 ROM, and stiffness in right/left axial rotation (RAR/LAR), and similar stiffness in extension as compared with C2 pedicle screw fixation (C2PED). They observed significantly greater atlantoaxial stabilization in the sagittal and coronal planes as compared to C2PED construct. Hence, they concluded C2SPED-C3LM, a suitable alternative surgical strategy for atlantoaxial instability providing a superior atlantoaxial fixation vs C2PED.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries