• Profile
Close

A phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel vs irinotecan in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer who failed in first-line therapy (KCSG ST10-01)

The Oncologist Aug 28, 2018

Lee KW, et al. - In this phase III study of patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC) who had experienced disease progression following first-line chemotherapy, researchers compared the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel vs irinotecan. Treatment regimen comprised either paclitaxel (70 mg/m2; days 1, 8, 15, every 4 weeks) or irinotecan (150 mg/m2 every other week). Paclitaxel vs irinotecan resulted in numerically longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), although not statistically significant. Both irinotecan and paclitaxel were proved to be valid second-line treatment options in MRGC. In the paclitaxel group, the most common ≥ grade 3 toxicity was neutropenia (11.5%), followed by peripheral neuropathy (7.7%). In the irinotecan group, neutropenia (34.5%) followed by nausea, vomiting, and anemia (8.6%, respectively) were the ≥ grade 3 toxicities.
Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay