• Profile
Close

A comparative retrospective study of locking plate fixation vs a dedicated external fixator of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: Results after 5 years

Injury Mar 16, 2019

Vicenti G, et al. - Researchers compared patients alternatively treated with plates and screws vs external fixation system for a type III-IV proximal humerus fracture (PHF) regarding clinical and radiological outcomes. They analyzed 69 patients who underwent surgery for type III-IV PHF between January 2011 and January 2014. Observations revealed that in PHF treatment, percutaneous techniques have a long tradition. They noted the achievement of improved stability and possibility of early rehabilitation in correlation with the introduction of dedicated external fixation system when compared to the classical pinning technique. As per observation, this type of mini-invasive surgery seems beneficial for elderly patients with osteoporosis and comorbidities with low soft tissue damages.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay